Introduction
This analysis is about a case study of John, a 38-year-old man who experienced grief and loss following the demise of his wife, Racheal. The wife succumbed to cancer six months ago, and the issues have disturbed him since then. The paper analyzes John’s grief and correlated factors, relationships, and effects on the grieving process.
Then, two different clinical and theoretical strategies for grief and loss will be selected and applied to the case analysis to clarify the grieving process. The paper will reveal whether John’s grief can be classified as complicated or uncomplicated, depending on established criteria and the characteristics visible in the scenario. Definitively, a treatment plan will be recommended, informed by examining the case and the selected approaches, with interventions and goals to address John’s needs.
Case Study Analysis
Symptoms
John’s grief reactions can be linked to different symptoms related to despair, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The symptoms in this scenario include obsessive thoughts regarding his wife and difficulty sleeping. John is extremely obsessed with feelings and reflections about the death of his wife. He struggles to accept the incident, which hinders his ability to continue working on other affairs. The complaint about sleeping difficulties is attributable to intense emotional distress, leading to fatigue and hopelessness.
John is experiencing a loss of interest in aspects he used to enjoy, guilt, lack of purpose, loneliness, isolation, and detachment. These symptoms indicate depression and loneliness, typical after losing a loved one. The lack of a sense of purpose is linked to the struggle to find a novel meaning in life following the experiences he shared with Rachel.
The symptoms are consistent with common reactions to grief, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic. These feelings can significantly impact an individual’s ability to connect socially, leading to isolation and disconnection. Conclusively, John is showing symptoms that indicate his struggle with complicated grief, which requires therapeutic interventions.
Causes
John’s childhood experiences are linked to his vulnerability to the grief reaction. A destabilized family environment with constant disputes and conflicts can be stressful for children (Andriessen et al., 2020). John’s parents were involved in persistent wrangles with arguments and fights, creating a distressful home situation. John felt like he had never experienced a stable home during his stay with his parents. His childhood experiences have created poor self-esteem and caused vulnerability in reacting to the grief.
Another issue is the struggle to make friends in school due to the different parenting styles that he experienced from his parents. The difficulties caused by poor parenting activities by the parents led to a deficiency in childhood social skills that are still affecting John’s ability to cope with grief. These childhood experiences may have affected John’s vulnerability to the grief response. The death of Racheal may have elicited his childhood traumas and rekindled lingering emotions of grief, abandonment, and rejection., abandonment, and rejection.
Theoretical Approaches
Dual Process Model
One of the theoretical approaches applicable to John’s scenario is the dual process model. The approach suggests that people exhibit two coping mechanisms during the grieving process: loss-oriented and restoration-oriented. Loss-oriented coping mechanisms involve accepting and processing the loss (Thompson & Cox, 2019). An example would be attending counseling sessions to gain the strength and knowledge to process emotions and thoughts concerning the death.
On the contrary, restoration-oriented coping mechanisms involve dealing with practical life changes resulting from the loss or creating a memorial to honor the deceased. Such changes may involve staying alone, attending to additional responsibilities, and more financial requirements. The Dual Process Model provides an integrated approach to grief, allowing individuals to balance loss- and restoration-oriented coping mechanisms.
Attachment Theory
Another theory that can be useful to John’s case is the attachment theory. The attachment theory states that grief is a common and natural reaction to losing an attachment figure. This indicates that an individual undergoes detachment and adjustment after losing a person to whom they were closely attached, which is a painful experience. The theory offers valuable insights into how attachment impacts John’s grief reaction. The quality of attachment affects the intensity of grief for losing a loved one (Tidwell et al., 2021).
In John’s case, there was a healthy attachment with his wife, which can be attributed to the prolonged duration of his reaction to the loss. Attachment theory provides a framework for understanding and viewing grief experiences as normal. In John’s case, it is normal to feel lonely and affected after losing a loved one. The attachment theory helps explain the reaction of John to Racheal’s death based on their attachment bond.
Defining Grief Category
Grief can be classified as complicated or uncomplicated based on characteristics exhibited by the bereaved. Considering the criteria established in the literature, John’s grief may be grouped as complicated grief (Iglewiz et al.,30). John’s symptoms are more severe compared to what is regarded as normal grief reactions.
Complicated grief is characterized by deep and amplified symptoms that hamper daily functioning, preoccupation with memories about the deceased, and trouble accepting the loss. Individuals with complicated grief often feel emotionally numb, estranged from others, and have a diminished sense of self or discomfort with a changed social role (Iglewicz et al., 2020). They may also experience confusion and frustration with their seemingly endless grief. John has been experiencing symptoms of detachment, loss of interest, guilt, loneliness, and a sense of purposelessness and meaninglessness for six months, which are interfering with his ability to perform normal daily tasks. John’s friends and relatives may not understand how to help him and could become critical or stop contacting him, which may increase his isolation.
Treatment Plan
John’s situation is complicated, and he still seems fresh in his mind despite having happened six months ago. John has a history of family issues of disconnection, depression, and anxiety, which can be linked to childhood experiences. These issues must be resolved by acknowledging his grief and supporting his children to adjust. The selected clinical and theoretical approaches include Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and attachment theory. The treatment will be based on the seven main components of complicated grief.
The first component is establishing the lay of the land, which is accomplished by discussing the nature of the loss and its complications. The first step is performing psychoeducation about grief and the grieving process. The second component is promoting self-regulation through self-monitoring, self-observation, and reflection.
The third component is building connections with others through strategies for meaningful connections and letting others help. The fourth component is setting aspirational goals, exploring ambition for personal goals and activities, and creating a sense of purpose and possibilities for future happiness. The fifth component is revisiting the world, which involves confronting or revisiting avoided situations. The sixth component is storytelling, recounting, and reflecting on the story of the death to create an acceptable account (Iglewicz et al., 2020). The seventh component is using memory, reviewing positive memories of the deceased, and inviting reminiscence of negative memories.
The clinician should also evaluate and diagnose John to determine if he has complicated grief. The presence of thoughts and behaviors indicative of complicated grief should be assessed through a clinical interview. Screening questionnaires such as the Brief Grief Questionnaire or the Inventory of Complicated Grief can be used to screen patients for complicated grief (Boelen & Eisma, 2022). If John is found to have complicated grief, psychotherapy is the first-line treatment. Complicated grief treatment is the most extensively studied approach, which includes restoration and loss.
Restoration involves restoring effective functioning by generating enthusiasm and creating plans for the future (Milman et al.,2019). In contrast, loss involves helping patients find a way to think about the death that does not evoke intense feelings of anger, guilt, or anxiety. Grief monitoring and other weekly activities are assigned at the end of each session.
Goals of Treatment
- Establish coping approaches for grief and loss.
- Deal with negative thoughts and beliefs that are causing stress and anxiety.
- Enhance interpersonal relationships with friends and his children.
- Resolving unsettled attachment issues from childhood.
- Improve John’s ability to regulate emotions.
- Enhance John’s sense of purpose and meaning in life.
Interventions to Achieve the Proposed Treatment Goals
Psychoeducation About Grief and Loss
Psychoeducation is a crucial intervention in the treatment of complicated grief. This intervention involves providing adequate information to the client about the normal grieving process. These details can assist them in comprehending what to expect and controlling their experiences and emotions.
The information provided can include common symptoms, the phases of grief, and the typical estimated duration of the grieving process (Stroebe et al., 2017). Understanding what they are experiencing is a common part of the grieving process. The client may adapt and feel less lonely and in control of their emotions.
In John’s case, psychoeducation can help him understand the distinction between normal and complicated grief. Such information is crucial in knowing how the situation has altered his life and the options that can assist in the recovery process. This can benefit John, who feels guilty and ashamed about the prolonged grief symptoms or believes he should not be experiencing such challenges by now. Explaining that complicated grief is a common and recognized condition that may need professional treatment; the therapist can assist John in feeling validated and encourage him to seek the needed assistance (Rachamim et al., 2020).
Overall, psychoeducation about grief and loss can help clients understand and accept their experiences, reduce their isolation, and normalize their feelings. It can also provide the foundation for other therapeutic interventions focusing on coping strategies and improving the client’s overall well-being.
Identifying and Managing Symptoms of Complicated Grief
Identifying and managing symptoms of complicated grief is essential to John’s treatment plan. Complicated grief can manifest in various ways, including intense yearning for the deceased, disbelief or denial of the loss, preoccupation with the deceased, and a sense of meaninglessness or purposelessness (Iglewicz et al., 2020). It is important to work with John to identify the specific symptoms of complicated grief that he is experiencing and develop strategies for managing them.
One method to accomplish this step is to use CBT. The approach can assist John in exploring, identifying, and overcoming both positive and negative thought patterns, such as guilt, sadness, and hopelessness. This step can also assist them in acquiring relevant coping strategies to control emotions through relaxation techniques, mindfulness, and stress management (Eisma & Stroebe, 2021; Stroebe et al., 2017). John needs assistance to be more aware of the precipitating factors that cause depression and be able to deal with them appropriately.
Other strategies to help manage the symptoms can be medication and listening to therapeutic music. Overall, the objective of identifying and managing signs of complicated grief is to assist John in reclaiming a sense of control over his life and emotions and begin rebuilding a sense of purpose and meaning after his loss.
Family Play Therapy
Play therapy can be useful for John and his family in creating connections and addressing deficiencies in their relationship. Family play therapy is an approach that combines play and family therapy to address relational and emotional issues within the family. It involves the therapist working with the family to create a safe and supportive environment for play and exploration.
Through family play therapy, John can engage in playful activities with his children while addressing his feelings of inadequacy. The therapist can guide the family in exploring feelings, behaviors, and communication patterns within the family while engaging in play activities. This can improve John’s relationship with his children and help him connect with them emotionally.
In addition to family play therapy, family therapy can also help John work through conflicts with his parents and improve his relationships with them (Salinas, 2021). Through family therapy, John can address any unresolved issues from his childhood and work towards building a more supportive and positive relationship with his parents. The therapist can help the family communicate more effectively, resolve conflicts, and establish healthy boundaries.
Mindfulness Meditation and Attachment-Focused Therapy
The therapist will use mindfulness meditation techniques to help John regulate his emotions and manage feelings of anxiety and depression. Mindfulness practice involves paying attention to present-moment experiences with curiosity and without judgment. By helping John become more aware of his thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations, the therapist can help him develop a greater sense of control over his internal experiences.
Attachment-focused therapy will facilitate the exploration of John’s attachment history and how it impacts his current relationships. This approach recognizes that early attachment experiences with caregivers influence how individuals perceive and interact with others (Furrow & Palmer, 2019). By helping John gain insight into his attachment patterns, the therapist can help him develop strategies for improving his relationships with others.
Cognitive Restructuring
In John’s case, he may be experiencing negative thoughts such as “I will never be happy again,” “I am failing as a father,” or “I am alone in the world.” Cognitive restructuring is a therapeutic intervention that focuses on helping individuals identify and challenge negative thought patterns often associated with grief and loss (Ezawa & Hollon, 2023). These thoughts can be very distressing and exacerbate his complicated grief symptoms. By engaging in cognitive restructuring, John can learn to reframe his thoughts and beliefs about his loss, which can ultimately help him to feel more positive and hopeful about his future. Additionally, by learning how to challenge negative thoughts, John can develop the skills to manage future challenges that may arise in his life.
Exposure Therapy
Exposure therapy is a form of therapy that involves gradually confronting and processing traumatic or distressing memories, emotions, and situations. In John’s case, the therapist can use exposure therapy to help him confront and process his grief related to his wife’s death. This can involve gradually exposing John to memories of his wife and the loss he experienced.
For example, the therapist may ask John to talk about his wife and her memories or look at pictures or mementos of her. The exposure can be safely controlled, with the therapist providing support and guidance (Wojtkowiak et al., 2021). The therapy can help John learn to tolerate the distressing emotions associated with his grief and develop coping strategies to manage them.
Justification
The combination of CBT and attachment theory is beneficial for addressing John’s current symptoms of grief and loss, as well as his childhood attachment issues. CBT can assist him in understanding and challenging negative thinking patterns that are exacerbating his symptoms of anxiety and depression (Mason et al., 2020).
Attachment-focused therapy can help John comprehend how his attachment history influences his current relationships and provide him with strategies for improving them. By exploring these issues and addressing his unresolved childhood trauma, John can improve his overall sense of well-being and ability to cope with grief and loss. Mindfulness techniques and journaling can help him regulate his emotions and find meaning and purpose in his life after the loss of his wife (Breen & Fernandez, 2019). Overall, this integrated approach can provide John with a comprehensive plan for recovery and growth.
Conclusion
John is experiencing complicated grief after losing his wife, Racheal. The chosen interventions of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Grief Counseling may help John process his grief, manage his symptoms of depression and anxiety, and develop new coping strategies. Medication may also be considered as part of John’s treatment plan. The proposed goals for the treatment plan are to help John accept the loss of Racheal, manage his symptoms of depression and anxiety, and develop new coping strategies. The analysis of the case justifies the proposed interventions, the chosen approaches, and John’s individual needs.
References
Andriessen, K., Krysinska, K., Rickwood, D., & Pirkis, J. (2020). “It changes your orbit”: the impact of suicide and traumatic death on adolescents as experienced by adolescents and parents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9356. Web.
Boelen, P. A., & Eisma, M. C. (2022). The Handbook of Grief Therapies. Springer.
Breen, L. J., & Fernandez, M. E. (2019). Non-death loss and grief. Routledge.
Eisma, M. C., & Stroebe, M. S. (2021). Emotion regulatory strategies in complicated grief: A systematic review. Behavior Therapy, 52(1), 234-249. Web.
Ezawa, I. D., & Hollon, S. D. (2023). Cognitive restructuring and psychotherapy outcome: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy.
Furrow, J. L., & Palmer, G. (2019). Emotionally focused family therapy. Springer International Publishing.
Iglewicz, A., Shear, M. K., Reynolds III, C. F., Simon, N., Lebowitz, B., & Zisook, S. (2020). Complicated grief therapy for clinicians: An evidence‐based protocol for mental health practice. Depression and Anxiety, 37(1), 90-98. Web.
Mason, T. M., Tofthagen, C. S., & Buck, H. G. (2020). Complicated grief: Risk factors, protective factors, and interventions. Journal of Social Work in End-of-life & Palliative Care, 16(2), 151-174. Web.
Milman, E., Neimeyer, R. A., Fitzpatrick, M., MacKinnon, C. J., Muis, K. R., & Cohen, S. R. (2019). Prolonged grief and the disruption of meaning: Establishing a mediation model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(6), 714. Web.
Rachamim, L., Nacasch, N., & Sinay, I. (2022). Complicated grief, depression, health, and attachment style in first-degree relatives of individuals with chronic psychotic disorders. Community Mental Health Journal, 58(3), 526-535. Web.
Salinas, C. L. (2021). Playing to heal: The impact of bereavement camp for children with grief. International Journal of Play Therapy, 30(1), 40. Web.
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Boerner, K. (2017). Cautioning health-care professionals: Bereaved persons are misguided through the stages of grief. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 74(4), 455-473. Web.
Thompson, N., & Cox, G. R. (Eds.). (2019). Promoting resilience: Responding to adversity, vulnerability, and loss. Routledge.
Tidwell, B. L., Larson, E. D., & Bentley, J. A. (2021). Attachment security and continuing bonds: The mediating role of meaning-made in bereavement. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 26(2), 116-133. Web.
Wojtkowiak, J., Lind, J., & Smid, G. E. (2021). Ritual in therapy for prolonged grief: A scoping review of ritual elements in evidence-informed grief interventions. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11(1), 1-12. Web.