Abstract
Divorce is a traumatic experience for families since children are exposed to significant psychological stress. The conflict-based drawbacks in collaborative parenting decision-making of divorced parents jeopardize children’s healthy development. For that matter, divorce mediation as a conflict-management intervention has been widely used to assist divorced couples in co-parenting.
This research proposal introduces a planned study to investigate the effectiveness of divorce mediation in facilitating co-parenting. The research question of the intended study is as follows: In divorced families with one or more children aged 18 or younger, what are the co-parenting benefits of divorce mediation for children?
The proposal includes a discussion of the research context, the importance of the topic due to the omnipresence of parenting issues in divorced families, and the methodology selected for the proposed study. It is planned to conduct a qualitative descriptive study based on semi-structured interviews with divorced families and their children to compare the parenting outcomes of those using mediation and those not using it. The study is expected to fill a research gap by providing clear evidence on the effectiveness of divorce mediation as a gateway to effective co-parenting.
Introduction
In contemporary society, divorce is a common phenomenon in family life, which involves couples’ separation due to a variety of reasons, leading to their terminated co-living. Statistics show that approximately 40% of all people are likely to experience their parents’ divorce in their lifetime (Jackson & Fife, 2018). Such an episode in life is often traumatic for all parties involved due to the ultimate change in everyday life; however, children, as psychologically vulnerable individuals, are exposed to the risks associated with diminished parenting quality due to divorce. The proposed research study will focus on the use of divorce mediation as an intervention capable of facilitating co-parenting for the benefit of children of divorce.
The effectiveness of divorce mediation in divorced couples having one or more children under 18 years old will be investigated by comparing the interviews with two groups of participants, namely divorced parents using divorce mediation and those not using any assistance. The study will seek to identify the factors contributing to the effectiveness of mediating interventions as a child-benefiting co-parenting solution. The proposal provides an overview of the research problem, relevant literature on the topic, design, methods, and ethics of the planned study.
Commonly, divorce undermines the healthy development and psychological well-being of children. According to Garriga and Pennoni (2020), the consequences of a divorce for children’s psychological well-being and cognitive development depend on the quality of couples’ relationships during the divorce and might be both positive and negative. Nonetheless, while non-harmful outcomes for children might occur in divorce cases with limited conflicts and effective management of disputes, the children in families that experience psychologically burdened and traumatizing divorce processes are exposed to significant psychological risks.
Such findings have been repeatedly reported by Brand, Moore, Song, and Xie (2019), Van Dijk, Van Der Valk, Deković, and Branje (2020), and many other scholars. During the experience of parental divorce in early childhood, children are exposed to family instability, elevated emotional disturbance, and trauma, which diminish educational attainment, psychological well-being, and cognitive development (Brand et al., 2019). Moreover, the negative impact of experiences during a parental divorce has a more enduring and stronger effect on children than positive ones (Van Dijk et al., 2020). Therefore, it is evident that parenting malfunctioning during a divorce is a traumatic experience for children, which should be mitigated and prevented.
Given the traumatizing effects of divorce on co-parenting and the overall children’s outcomes, mediation as an effective intervention has been implemented and claimed to have positive results. Indeed, parents who use cooperative co-parenting strategies based on mediation report significant improvements in their communication and decision-making regarding their children (Eikrem & Jevne, 2022). Based on these evidentiary grounds, this proposal aims to conduct a study on the effectiveness of co-parenting informed by divorce mediation from the perspective of children’s well-being. The relevance of this issue is predetermined by the prevalence of divorced families and the requirement for updated parenting mechanisms for the benefit of children. Thus, the parties affected by the outcomes of the proposed study will include families, communities, children, and practitioners, as the co-parenting management will be informed by evidence to support proper counseling and divorce conflict mitigation.
Problem Statement
This section of the research proposal presents the problem addressed by the planned study, along with the research aim, objectives, and questions. The majority of studies focus on the outcomes of divorce mediation for parents as they attempt to reach common solutions and minimize conflict. However, it is essential to prioritize children’s outcomes and the perceived benefits of mediation as a co-parenting solution. For that purpose, the proposed research aims to identify how divorce mediation helps couples manage their parenting duties while prioritizing children’s best interests. The objectives of the proposed study are as follows:
- To detect challenges that divorce mediation is capable of mitigating.
- To identify the factors that predetermine co-parenting effectiveness in divorced families.
- To identify the benefits of divorce mediation for parents.
- To identify the positive effects of divorce mediation on children’s psychological well-being.
The research question of the proposed study is three-fold and includes the following three questions.
- RQ1: In divorced families with children aged 18 or younger, what benefits for children does the co-parenting of divorce mediation present?
- RQ2: Among divorced families with children younger or aged 18, how does the co-parenting effectiveness of parents exposed to divorce mediation differ from that of those without mediation interventions?
- RQ3: What are the specific benefits of divorce mediation compared to adversarial settlement processes in terms of co-parenting outcomes?
- The addressing of these research questions is anticipated to clarify the implications of divorce mediation as a reliable and effective tool for parenting facilitation after divorce.
- RQ4: How does mediation influence emotional satisfaction and psychological well-being for both parents and their children?
Theoretical and Research Foundations
Theoretical Frameworks Supporting Divorce Mediation
Simultaneous consideration of several theoretical perspectives on the investigated problem strengthens the research’s reliability and validity through theoretical triangulation. Indeed, when theorizing about the issues of divorce mediation and its impact on families from both short- and long-term perspectives, the researcher benefits from conceptualizing them within the contexts of distinctive psychological approaches. In this manner, different aspects of the same problem might be revealed, and the research results interpreted accurately. The review of relevant literature has revealed three core theoretical frameworks about the psychological issues of divorce in general and divorce mediation as an effective intervention in particular. More specifically, these theories include social learning theory, life course theory, and attachment theory.
Social Learning Theory
Firstly, the social learning theory allows for looking at divorce and its management from a perspective of observed, learned, and reinforced behaviors. In particular, this theory was introduced by Albert Bandura, an influential figure in psychological studies, who argued that an individual’s behavior is predetermined by the environment (Bandura, 1979). Moreover, the implications of social learning theory are particularly relevant in early childhood, when children are most susceptible to acquiring behavioral patterns and to copying their parents’ attitudes (Bandura & Hall, 2021). For that matter, the social learning theory supports the notion that a child exposed to a conflict-ridden divorce at an early age is likely to acquire impaired socialization skills and ineffective conflict management strategies, due to observing poorly managed communication and dysfunctional parenting in the divorcees.
Several studies have investigated divorce issues through the lens of social learning theory, including Jackson and Fife (2018) and Lee (2018). In particular, Jackson and Fife (2018) used the social learning theory as a foundation for their investigation of relationship-building capability and social support experienced by children who were exposed to parental divorce. The study found that the quality of family relationships after divorce was more indicative of children’s social relationships than their quantity (Jackson & Fife, 2018).
Similarly, Lee (2018) referred to the social learning theory as a framework to solidify the findings on the satisfaction with romantic relationships in adolescents who had experienced parental divorce. The findings suggested that the observed relationships between divorced parents influenced children’s romantic relationships later in life (Lee, 2018). Thus, social learning theory is a solid theoretical framework for a reliable psychological study capable of explaining behavioral mechanisms in children under the circumstances of divorce.
Life Course Theory
The second theory that applies to the problem of divorce’s impact on children and the ability to mitigate negative implications is the life course theory. This theory was introduced by Elder Jr (1998), who claimed that “changing lives alter developmental trajectories” (p. 1). This theory holds that early childhood experiences or traumatic life events inevitably impact personality development in later life (Elder Jr., 1998).
Compared with the social learning theory, this framework does not provide a clear explanation of the mechanism underlying a particular developmental change. However, it clarifies the psychological burden of life events on decision-making and problem-solving in adulthood. For example, a study conducted by Demir-Dagdas (2019) on the prevalence of smoking in individuals who experienced divorce or their parents in early childhood was based on the life course perspective. It solidified its findings by referencing the long-term implications of divorce. Overall, this theory allows for establishing a psychological connection between the effectiveness of communication between divorced parents under the influence of mediation and the anticipated outcomes of children’s development in adulthood.
Attachment Theory
Finally, the third theory applicable to the problem of divorce from a psychological perspective is attachment theory. It was introduced by Bowlby and Ainsworth (2013) to explain bonding between caregivers and a cared-for individual as a developmental premise. The theory holds that “the infant and young child should experience a warm, intimate, and continuous relationship with his mother (or permanent mother substitute) in which both find satisfaction and enjoyment” (Bowlby & Ainsworth, 2013).
When applied to the context of divorce and its outcomes for children, the attachment theory allows for conceptualizing the negative implications for child development by referring to the deteriorated attachment to a separated parent as a pivotal factor in impaired child well-being (Lamb, 2021). Compared with the social learning theory and the life course theory, the attachment framework seems to lack a holistic perspective on divorce, focusing on mother-infant relationships and specifically the early stages of childhood. However, the use of this theoretical framework in the proposed study could help explore alternative perspectives on the implications of divorce for child development.
The review of these three theories demonstrates that the short- and long-term aftermath of divorce has an enduring negative impact on parents and children; however, it might be avoided with the help of effective mediating practices. Given the universality of social learning theory, which addresses the short- and long-term psychological implications of divorce for children, this framework will serve as the focal theory of the proposed study.
Literature Review
In this part of the proposal, recent scholarly literature on co-parenting among divorced couples is reviewed in the context of its applicability to the proposed research problem. Multiple research studies have investigated interventions aimed at regulating relationships between parents and their custody arrangements during a divorce. The reviewed literature is subcategorized into themes: the negative impact of divorce on child development, divorce mediation, its role in co-parenting, and theoretical frameworks. The review of the literature allows for conceptualizing the problem, situating it in a scholarly context, and validating the necessity of the proposed study as a contribution to the body of academic literature that supports families, communities, and practitioners.
Negative Impact of Divorce on Child Development
Multiple studies have covered the implications of divorce on children. The concurrent theme in such studies is the inability of parents to manage their parenting duties as a key determinant of child impaired development across the lifespan (Brand et al., 2019; Demir-Dagdas, 2019; Eikrem, T., & Jevne, 2022; Jackson & Fife, 2018). Indeed, Van Dijk et al. (2020) claim that the adverse experiences of children during the divorce of their parents have a more enduring and destructive impact on their lives than positive ones. In addition, the study by Brand et al. (2019) found that parental divorce has a stressful influence on a child’s psychological state and the ability to cope with difficulties, which is why deteriorated educational attainment is one of the most frequently observed negative outcomes of divorce.
Furthermore, the quality of relationships between parents going through a divorce has been found to have a significant impact on a child’s well-being. As stated by Garriga and Pennoni (2020), the manifestation of either positive, understanding relationships or negative, conflictual relationships between divorcing parents was correlated with children’s cognitive development. Similarly, according to Demir-Dagdas (2019), individuals who have experienced parental divorce or separation in their early childhood are more likely to be ineffective in social engagement and are prone to cigarette smoking dependence at later stages of life.
In addition to proneness to dependencies and poor educational achievements, the children traumatized by divorce are likely to suffer from a dysfunctional relationship with their partners, as well as lack social support in the future (Jackson & Fife, 2018; Lee, 2018). These findings illustrate both short- and long-term antecedents of divorce for children that have negative implications on their emotional regulation, lifestyle choices, socialization, cognitive development, and coping skills advancement. Therefore, the literature review on the negative impact of divorce implies the need to implement highly effective measures for conflict resolution and parenting management to minimize the harm of divorce on children.
Divorce Mediation as a Conflict Management Intervention
Mediation as a means of regulating and managing divorce-related arrangements has been widely used and investigated. In particular, Rowell (2019) stated that, due to the overloaded court system with divorce cases, mandatory mediation practices enhance marriage settlements, contribute to cost- and time-efficient divorce handling, and facilitate the easier attainment of beneficial solutions. In general, a divorce mediation practice is a process for settling family matters under the supervision of lawyers and counselors to regulate separation agreements in accordance with the law, in pursuit of the best outcome for the family (Riskin, 2018).
In practice, this intervention is held as a meeting between a divorcing couple and a trained mediator who helps resolve marital issues by discussing, informing, educating, and instructing (Risking, 2018). Crampton (2022) found that divorce mediation has enabled effective resolution of family issues at the stage of separation, enhancing benefits for all involved parties with limited stress and psychological burden. Overall, the popularity, relevance, and efficiency of this practice have facilitated the court system’s handling of divorce cases and enhanced positive outcomes for families.
The Role of Divorce Mediation in Co-Parenting
Among other family disputes addressed by the divorce mediation efforts, childcare and parenting duties are central to these efforts. Indeed, as reported by Eikrem and Jevne (2022), both low and high conflict level divorcing families face obstacles of misunderstanding and failed communication when attempting co-parenting after the divorce. In particular, a study by researchers found that mediation helped structure efforts and mobilize both parents’ work in the upbringing of their children; nonetheless, the couple’s contributions and hard work are essential (Eikrem & Jevne, 2022). Moreover, Hietanen (2021) states that the core problems that obstruct effective cooperative parenting in couples after divorce are related to communication disruptions or ineffective communication strategies.
Importantly, the educational aspect of divorce mediation for the development and use of cooperative parenting skills has been found to have a strong effect on children’s development in divorced families. In particular, according to the research study conducted by Lau (2021), the ability of parents to cope with conflicts and prioritize their child’s interests when tackling family issues after divorce enhances the child’s positive experiences and exposes them to a favorable environment that supports healthy development. It is most relevant to apply the divorce mediating techniques and practices for high-conflict-level families to ease the burden of psychological trauma on children and assist the couple in managing their parenting duties.
Such insights have been vividly articulated by McHale and Carter (2019), who investigated advanced parenting practices, with the assistance of specialists, as a means of addressing conflicting divorce and its impact on child outcomes. Thus, the outcomes of divorce mediation for co-parenting are positive, helping minimize conflict and establish a healthy environment for children. However, the reviewed literature lacks a comparative perspective on the specific differences in parenting duties between divorced couples who use mediation and those who do not. This insight is the novelty of the proposed research, which will inform relevant updates to the use of divorce mediation for child benefits in contemporary society.
Methodology
Research Approach and Design
This section provides an overview of the research design for the study. A qualitative inquiry will be selected to collect and analyze data. The choice of research design is predetermined by the research aim and questions, which prioritize the investigation of divorce mediation and its effectiveness as perceived by divorced parents and their children.
For that purpose, a descriptive research design will be used to identify and interpret the factors affecting co-parenting effectiveness and the familial benefits of divorce mediation (McBride, 2018). Due to the lack of variable manipulation or any intended change to the research setting (as it might be used in an experimental study), the descriptive design aims to document the observed phenomena and the manifestations of the researched issues as reported by the participants. Moreover, since the core of the proposed study is the perceived benefits of divorce mediation for children and divorced parents, a descriptive qualitative approach is appropriate to meet the research objectives.
Research Methods
This section of the proposal covers the methodology of the planned study. In particular, it outlines the methods of data collection and analysis, the intended sample, sampling techniques, and methods for proving study credibility and validity. Overall, the rationale for selecting these methods is to validate the relevance of the researcher’s ontological and methodological perspectives to the context and particularities of the planned study, as well as to the characteristics of the population of participants.
Firstly, the data collection method will be semi-structured interviews. Such a method of data collection allows for retrieving in-depth, full answers to questions, with the researcher able to engage respondents in the conversation for a fuller understanding of their perceptions of the investigated phenomenon (Roulston, K., & Choi, 2018). Secondly, the intended method of data analysis is thematic analysis, which will be conducted by a researcher who will listen to the recorded interviews and read the transcripts to systematize responses to the questions based on identified patterns or themes (Roulston & Choi, 2018). The responses of parents will be reviewed separately from those of children, to ensure the research objectives are addressed and the research questions are answered.
Thirdly, a non-randomized sampling technique will be used to enroll participants who meet the study’s eligibility criteria. For that matter, families with children under or aged 18 will be asked to participate in the study. Among them, ten families attending divorce mediation interventions and ten families not attending such interventions will be selected. Thus, the study sample will include 15 families, which is deemed sufficient to allow the researcher to interview participants within the time frame. To ensure the research’s credibility, theoretical triangulation and thick, detailed descriptions will be used.
The planned actions and expenses within the proposed study are as follows:
- Extensive literature review – 2 months;
- Participant search and enrollment – 1 month;
- Conducting interviews – 1 month;
- Transcribing and analyzing recorded data – 1 month;
- Thematic analysis interpretation – 2 weeks;
- Data systematization and reporting – 1 month.
Implications and Limitations
Ethical Considerations
In scientific research, ethical considerations regarding participants and sensitive data are pivotal. The needs and rights of vulnerable populations who might be enrolled in the study will be prioritized to ensure non-discriminatory treatment throughout the research process (Hilbig, Thielmann, & Böhm, 2022). To ensure the openness and non-deception of the research, as well as to ensure volunteer participation, written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to the study’s beginning.
A written explanation of the research’s goals, objectives, and context will be disseminated to participants at the time of enrollment (Hilbig et al., 2022). In addition, the specificities of the study and the procedures for data collection, analysis, and dissemination will be explained to participants before the interviews. In this manner, the individuals participating in the study will be aware of the procedure and the use of their data for scientific purposes, and no ethical violations will occur.
To comply with the principles of harm avoidance and non-malevolence, the interventions for data collection and interaction with participants will be informed by sensitive communication strategies. In particular, given the sensitivity of the research topic and the potential for high levels of tension and conflict, the researcher will raise ethical questions (Hilbig et al., 2022). Moreover, during data analysis, storage, and management, the rights to privacy and confidentiality will be preserved, which is why no personal data about participants will be disclosed. The proposed study will be conducted in accordance with relevant ethical policies and institutional regulations.
Apart from giving precedence to the requirements and entitlements of marginalized communities and guaranteeing impartial treatment, particular emphasis will be given to cultural nuances and contextual elements unique to the South African milieu. Ethical research requires an understanding of the many cultural customs and social norms related to co-parenting and divorce. This will enable the research to respect participants’ cultural customs and beliefs by using culturally competent methods to connect with them (Garriga & Pennoni, 2020). This might entail collaborating closely with cultural representatives or community leaders to ensure the study is conducted with dignity and consideration for participants’ unique cultural quirks.
Furthermore, opportunities for input and involvement will be implemented in order to improve accountability and transparency. Participants will have the opportunity to contribute to the study by creating interview questions and analyzing the findings. By accurately representing participants’ opinions, this participatory technique not only empowers participants but also enhances the ethical integrity of the study (Alderson & Morrow, 2020).
Furthermore, during the study, participants will get regular check-ins and debriefings to address any issues or discomfort they may be experiencing. The project intends to respect beneficence, fairness, and respect by actively including participants in the research process. This will eventually promote ethical research on co-parenting and divorce mediation in South Africa.
Potential ethical standards breaches may still occur during the study process, despite careful attempts to uphold them. If participant anonymity is jeopardized or compromised by inadvertent data leaks or security flaws in data storage and management systems, this may constitute an ethical violation (Booth et al., 2003). While confidentiality is ensured, participant information may be accessed or disclosed without authorization due to unanticipated technology flaws or human mistakes (Demir-Dagdas, 2019). Strict data security measures, including restricted access restrictions and encryption procedures, will be put in place to reduce this risk and safeguard participant privacy throughout the course of the study.
If participants are not given fully informed consent, especially regarding the dangers and rewards of their involvement, this might constitute another ethical transgression. Even if the study’s goals and methods are explained in detail, participants may be unaware of all the potential repercussions of taking part, particularly when sensitive subjects are involved (Crampton, 2022). To address this problem, researchers will ensure that the informed consent procedure is carried out in a culturally sensitive and intelligible manner, providing participants with ample opportunities to clarify and ask questions (McBride, 2018). Furthermore, constant communication and openness will be maintained to ensure that study participants are informed of any modifications or advancements to the protocol that may affect their involvement or welfare.
Furthermore, if power dynamics and coercion are not sufficiently taken into consideration throughout the study process, particularly when it comes to vulnerable populations like those going through divorce or custody issues, then there may be additional ethical transgressions. There is a risk of exploitation or undue influence when people feel pressured to engage because of social or familial expectations (Lau, 2021). To address this problem, researchers will ensure participation is informed and voluntary and monitor for any forms of coercion. This entails offering participants the freedom to leave the study at any time without repercussions and aggressively requesting their input to gauge their level of comfort and autonomy as the research progresses.
Expected Research Outcomes – Limitations and Delimitations
This proposal has been created with strong anticipation of achieving the research objectives and aims, as well as of filling the research gap in the lack of clear, up-to-date evidence on the effectiveness of divorce mediation as a co-parenting facilitation measure. The study’s expected outcomes are consistent with the research objectives and research questions. In particular, it is expected that the interview with parents will reveal the factors contributing to effective parenting and the challenges that obstruct mediation outcomes. In addition, it is anticipated that the responses of children and parents alike will illustrate the benefits of divorce mediation-informed co-parenting. The research is likely to contribute to the currently available body of academic literature on divorce and its psychological implications for children.
The anticipated limitations of the proposed study relate to sample size and self-reported data. Firstly, a relatively small sample of 20 families might hinder the achievement of generalizability and external validity. On the other hand, the prevalence of a significant difference in co-parenting effectiveness between couples in mediation and without mediation will allow for mitigating this limitation and using the findings for future research. Secondly, the selected methodology and research design involved investigating the perceived benefits of co-parenting guided by mediators, which might imply a significant level of subjectivity and bias. Nonetheless, since the study is conducted in the context of psychological research and seeks to prioritize human experiences reported through the lens of perception, the relevance of this methodology is worthwhile.
Conclusion
In summary, the research proposal has identified the context of the research problem and its relevance to contemporary society. In particular, due to the prevalence of divorces, the issues of parenting management with no harm to children’s psychological well-being are particularly important. The use of psychological evidence from reliable research studies is essential for informed decision-making and evidence-based psychological services.
For that matter, the study is planned to be conducted using the qualitative descriptive methodology, with semi-structured interviews of 20 divorced couples and their children. The data will be analyzed and systematized using thematic analysis with the following interpretation in accordance with the social learning theory. Given the sensitivity of the research matter, participants’ personal data will be protected from disclosure, and confidentiality and privacy will be guaranteed in accordance with ethical considerations. Overall, it is anticipated that the study will reveal the benefits of divorce mediation for children’s psychological well-being and identify essential factors contributing to the effectiveness of this intervention for continuous improvement, given the particularities of contemporary society.
References
Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2020). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. Sage.
Bandura, A. (1979). Self-referent mechanisms in social learning theory. American Psychologist, 34(5), 439–441.
Bandura, A., & Hall, P. (2021). Albert bandura and social learning theory. In S. MacBlain Learning theories for early years practice (pp. 78-85). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2003). The craft of research. University of Chicago press.
Bowlby, J., & Ainsworth, M. (2013). The origins of attachment theory. Attachment Theory: Social, Developmental, and Clinical Perspectives, 45(28), 759-775.
Brand, J. E., Moore, R., Song, X., & Xie, Y. (2019). Why does parental divorce lower children’s educational attainment? A causal mediation analysis. Sociological Science, 6, 264-292.
Crampton, A. (2022). “We make new families:” Findings from a family court mediation study. Family Court Review, 60(3), 391-410.
Demir-Dagdas, T. (2019). Parental divorce or separation during childhood and adult smoking: A mediation effects of social engagement. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 14(3), 248-258.
Eikrem, T., & Jevne, K. S. (2022). I do it for the children, and it’s not a walk in the park: Parents’ stories about how to maintain cooperative co‐parenting during the divorce process. Child & Family Social Work, 2022, 1-10.
Elder Jr, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1-12.
Garriga, A., & Pennoni, F. (2020). The causal effects of parental divorce and parental temporary separation on children’s cognitive abilities and psychological wellbeing according to parental relationship quality. Social Indicators Research, 161, 963-987.
Hietanen, P. (2021). The cooperative parenting triangle: A tool to help divorced parents. In The Routledge international handbook of shared parenting and best interest of the child (pp. 297-304). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., & Böhm, R. (2022). Bending our ethics code: Avoidable deception and its justification in psychological research. European Psychologist, 27(1), 62.
Jackson, L. J., & Fife, S. T. (2018). The impact of parental divorce: The relationship between social support and confidence levels in young adults. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 59(2), 123-140.
Lamb, M. E. (2021). An attachment theory approach to parental separation, divorce, and child custody. In R. A. Thompson, J. A. Simpson, & L. J. Berlin (Eds.), Attachment: The fundamental questions (pp. 357–364). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Lau, Y. K. (2021). Evaluation of CPI‐based co‐parenting education programs in Hong Kong: Implications for social work. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 15(2), 112-122.
Lee, S. A. (2018). Parental divorce, relationships with fathers and mothers, and children’s romantic relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 25(2), 121-134.
McBride, D. M. (2018). The process of research in psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McHale, J. P., & Carter, D. K. (2019). Through the eyes of the child: An advanced parenting coordination intervention for high conflict post-divorce families. The UB Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 156-163.
Riskin, L. L. (2018). Understanding mediators’ orientations, strategies, and techniques: A grid for the perplexed. In Mediation (pp. 137-181). New York, NY: Routledge.
Roulston, K., & Choi, M. (2018). Qualitative interviews. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 233-249). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rowell, D. M. (2019). Mandatory divorce mediation: Maximizing effectiveness [Doctoral dissertation], Ashford University.
Van Dijk, R., Van Der Valk, I. E., Deković, M., & Branje, S. (2020). A meta-analysis on interparental conflict, parenting, and child adjustment in divorced families: Examining mediation using meta-analytic structural equation models. Clinical Psychology Review, 79, 1-18.