Introduction
Counseling has endured major changes, and understanding its historical and social context is critical to comprehending the profession’s current state. The article in discussion introduced the idea of historization, which aims to examine the history behind counseling to identify its present state. Since the field has changed drastically over time, individuals and bodies are encouraged to adapt to evolving circumstances to avoid irrelevance. The paper summarizes the article, its highlights, and the importance of journals in developing research fields.
Article Summary
The author has used the article to claim that historical and social factors greatly influence the field of counseling. He argues that it is essential to consider the mentioned factors to comprehend the discipline’s current state (Ginter, 2002). He notes that the historization of counseling helps to provide a more informed understanding of its present state (Ginter, 2002). In addition, he highlights the role of the Journal of Counseling and Development in the process, identifying that the journal has played a significant part in shaping the area by publishing research (Ginter, 2002). The article emphasizes that the journal ought to continue offering an avenue for debate and dialogue within the field and that it must be able to adapt to evolving situations so as to maintain relevance.
Article Highlights
The author expresses several highlights in the article. Firstly, he has been able to relate the idea of historization and its significance to counseling. He has explained that it is important that individuals learn how the discipline has developed over the years. With such information, it is easier to comprehend how to modify approaches or create new ways of dealing with issues in the area. Ginter (2002) has identified that the field has undergone immense change, and those involved must try to comprehend the evolution process.
In addition to relating the field of counseling and historization, the author, through the article, has ensured that institutions or entities can actively participate in the growth and development of study areas. He has been able to challenge the status quo whereby most individuals or groups have forsaken their role in the advancement of fields (Ginter, 2002). For instance, in counseling, he has suggested through his work that journals can help in its growth through either scholarship or publication. Encouraging the production of more information about various topics enables the establishment of forums or debates where different individuals can further discuss and develop new data.
The last highlight is when the author challenges individuals to embrace adaptability (Ginter, 2002). In every field of study or practice, stakeholders must understand evolution and be willing to adapt to novel circumstances. This would ensure that they remain relevant in their areas of specialty. I agree that persons in various sectors need adaptive capability to ensure continued relevance. It is difficult to offer assistance with past and outdated methods to an issue that has experienced change.
Conclusion
The information provided in the paper shows that journals have a role to play in advancing research fields and professions. For instance, the author has suggested that the Journal of Counseling and Development has significantly ensured that the profession and field of counseling have improved over the years. In addition, he has used the opportunity to discuss adaptability in different areas to maintain relevance. He has noted that circumstances are changing and, thus, there is a need to adjust. To deal with new challenges that have not been witnessed in the past, an individual needs to adapt mechanisms to the present.
Reference
Ginter, E. J. (2002). Journal of Counseling & Development (JCD) and counseling’s interwoven nature: Achieving a more complete understanding of the present through “historization” (musings of an exiting editor—an editorial postscript). Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(2), 219-250. Web.