Introduction
Intelligence is an integral component with regard to human undertakings in social settings. It facilitates survival in various situations that characterize contemporary society. In light of these realities, experts have designed tests to determine an individual intelligence quotient. Such tests empower people towards realizing strengths and weaknesses in diverse areas of engagement. This essay formulates a response to the results of an intelligence test that I undertook. It is also concerned with the question how such results reflect an accurate representation of my abilities and competencies.
Accuracy of Test Results
The test results are accurate and reflect my strengths and weaknesses in different areas. The test is elaborate and representative because questions cover some important aspects of intelligence. The questions gear towards unearthing innate and acquired characteristics that determine the intelligence quotient. It is important to note that various aspects of the results are indicative of my prowess in different faculties. The results also satisfy the essence of intelligence testing. In most cases, experts use IQ tests to predict performance in such areas as education, employment, and aptitude. Intelligence testing creates impetus for experts to determine and generate personalized results of individual abilities in diverse areas of interest.
Examples of Relevant Questions
There are questions that were spot-on with regard to testing my competence in different areas of intelligence. For instance, the questions that sought to test competence in mathematics had a detailed sense of probity. They stimulated my thoughts in a unique way because I could relate to their inquisitive inclination. Evidently, mathematics is one of my favourite areas of interest because I find it exciting and informative. This explains why I scored highly in mathematics as opposed to other areas that embody intelligence testing. The question on general knowledge also played an important role in unearthing my potential in diverse areas of interest. My score in general knowledge is impressive and accurate.
Aspects of Intelligence Not Covered in Test
In my opinion, the test covered pertinent aspects of intelligence as articulated in scientific methods that seek to determine such facets of human nature. However, there was a small scope in the key areas such as cognitive thinking and ability to apply responsive techniques in handling life situations. This discrepancy was evident because there was no substantive effort towards this end. Cognitive ability has a role in enhancing reasoning and response to the physical and psychosocial stimuli. In absence of such skills, it is difficult to interpret cues that emanate from various engagements in society.
Rationale for Normative Group
Scientific research applies certain procedural practices to achieve accuracy and precision in its outcomes. Such undertakings provide a threshold of probity and relevance in research contexts. Use of normative groups is an example of procedures that seek to rationalize research outcomes and give room for consistency. By comparing my results with a normative group, the test attained parametrical relevance and justification. This is an important facet of scientific research and other forms of investigative endeavours.
Conclusion
As mentioned earlier, intelligence is a major factor in determining levels and extent of success in contemporary society. Most activities require skills and competencies that create impetus for action and reaction to various situations in life. Therefore, intelligence testing embodies efforts that determine individual inclination towards realization of the results in pertinent areas of engagement. Devoid of such inherent drive to succeed, it is impossible for people to surmount challenges that characterize human existence in society. Intelligence testing assists in quantification and exemplification of the important aspects of human understanding and probity.