Mental rotation is an imaginative process that is based on visualizing how an object or picture, either in 2 or 3-dimensional, might seem if it were rotated. There is a connection between parts of the brain linked with awareness and mental rotation. Furthermore, a connection could exist between the mental speed of three-dimensional processing, overall aptitude, and mental rotation. Mental rotation is the movement of items by the brain to help grasp not just what these items are but also where they fit. The mental rotation has been researched to understand better how the brain perceives objects in its surrounding, often referred to as stimuli by researchers.
In a mental rotation test, participators are tasked with examining two 3-dimensional objects which have undergone some rotation on an axis. Participants are then supposed to indicate whether these objects are mirror images or the same things. The test typically consists of pairs of images that have been rotated by a predetermined number of degrees. Some pairs will have the same image turned, whereas others will be mirrored. The researcher evaluates the subject’s ability to reliably and swiftly distinguish between reflected and non-reflected pairs.
Shepard and Metzler were the first to examine the phenomena in 1971. Their study was centered on the mental rotation of 3D objects. Numerous pairs of either 3D, unsymmetrical lined or diced objects were given to every single person. The aim of the research was to see how long it took every person to ascertain whether the two objects were identical or two dissimilar. As per their results, the response time for participators to assess whether a set of objects matched or not was directly related to the angle of rotation from the initial location (Shepard & Metzler, 1971). In other words, the more an object is rotated from its original position, the more time it takes to decipher whether the two pictures are of the same object or not.
Steven and Allan (1978) came up with a test to facilitate the examination of mental rotation capability. Their test was grounded on the innovative work of Shepard and Metzler. The Mental Rotations Test was made with Indian ink drawings. Each stimulus was a 2D computer-drawn picture of a 3D object. An oscilloscope was then used to display the image. Each picture was afterward displayed in a number of rotations around the vertical axis. This study, which followed the major principles of Shepard and Metzler’s research, discovered a major dissimilarity when it came to mental rotation tallies in both men and women, with males beating women. Relationships with other measures found a significant association with spatial visualization experiments but no link with verbal ability.
In 1999, research was performed to probe which area of the mind is occupied throughout the mental rotation. This experiment included 7 participants (four males and three females) ranging in age from twenty-nine to sixty-six. For the study, the individuals were presented with 8 characters four times each (two times in both normal and reversed orientation) (Vandenberg and Kuse, 1978). The participants were then required to assess whether the character was in a normal or reversed orientation. A Positron emission tomography (PET) scan was performed during this exercise, which revealed activity in the right posterior parietal lobe (Kosslyn et al., 1999). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessments of cognitive function during mental rotation show that the parietal lobe, particularly the inter-parietal sulcus, is always activated. This activation changes with task difficulty (Cohen et al., 1996). In general, the greater the angle of rotation, the greater the amount of brain activity connected with the job. This greater brain activity is associated with longer rotation task completion times and higher mistake rates (Paivio, 1969). According to researchers, the increased brain activation, duration, and mistake rates imply that task difficulty is related to the angle of rotation.
Cooper (1976) presented the notion of a “Mental Imagery” capacity in a later study, which is liable for the capability to mentally rotate optical figures. Furthermore, it has been discovered that the degree to which an item is rotated, rather than the axis on which it is turned, has the most crucial influence on response time. 2-dimensional rotations were identical to 3–dimensional rotations (Pylyshyn, 1979). As a result, the matching takes longer as the amount of depth rotation rises, exactly as it does inside the depth plane.
Other recent studies have focused on whether there are numerous brain systems involved in mental image rotation. Parsons (1987) observed that when participants were provided with line drawings of hands as an alternative to three-dimensional blocks used by Shepard and Metzler, they were sluggish to rotate hand stimuli in ways unreliable with how open arm joints moved. This research demonstrated that mental rotation representations were coordinated by many brain systems, including one tactile and one optical (Galton, 1880). Amorim et al. (2006) proved that introducing an elliptic “head” to Shepard and Metzler line drawings of three-dimensional items might result in facilitation and suppression compared to traditional Metzler-like stimuli, showing that these brain systems depend on assimilated cognition.
References
Amorim, M., Isableu, B. and Jarraya, M., 2006. Embodied spatial transformations: “Body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 327-347.
Cohen, M. S., Kosslyn, S. M., Breiter, H. C., DiGirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., Anderson, A. K.,… & Belliveau, J. W. (1996). Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI. Brain, 119(1), 89-100.
Cooper, L. A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 296-302.
Galton, F. (1880). Statistics of mental imagery. Mind, 5(19), 301-318.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Felician, O., Camposano, S., Keenan, J. P., Ganis, G.,… & Alpert, N. M. (1999). The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. Science, 284(5411), 167-170.
Parsons, L. M. (1987). Imagined spatial transformation of one’s body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(2), 172.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1979). The rate of “mental rotation” of images: A test of a holistic analog hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 7(1), 19-28.
Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76(3), 241.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701-703.
Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and motor skills, 47(2), 599-604.