Understanding Prejudice and Bias
Prejudice is a predetermined assumption from which all subsequent judgments are drawn. Prejudice is defined as a belief that blocks an accurate perception of reality. Positive biases are more frequently mentioned than negative prejudices.
Prejudices and biases are examples of the human element influencing information perception and decision-making. Recognizing this “noise” throughout the analysis of an issue and making a choice can dramatically enhance decision quality. Since people prefer to avoid noticing what is opposed to their belief systems, modifying prejudices using traditional logic or logical reasoning norms is exceedingly difficult. This is most likely owing to their association with phrases like “prejudice,” “racism,” “sexism,” and other forms of discrimination that the majority of us consider socially undesirable.
Unconscious and conscious mental processes both contribute to bias. Bias is commonly defined as the inclination to favor one item, person, or group over another, making it appear unjust. Although most people would want to believe that we are devoid of prejudice, bias is an inherent element of how most think and respond. Prejudice exists on two levels, with some prejudice being “conscious” and manifesting as racism, sexism, stereotyping, and discrimination. Most of us think of this when we talk about prejudice and refuse to accept that it bothers us at all. In our perceptions, conscious prejudice is connected with “bad” persons and behaviors that people passionately oppose.
The term “implicit bias” was coined by psychologists Mahzarin Banaji and Anthony Greenwald in their 1995 essay “Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes,” in which they stated that “social behavior frequently operates implicitly or unconsciously.” However, research has revealed that bias occurs in all of us in both beneficial and detrimental ways. People may get defensive when considering the potential impact on thoughts and behavior.
According to research, individuals at this unconscious level regard everyone differently as a threat because our brains have been programmed to do so for hundreds of years. People process and react to information in various ways, both consciously and subconsciously. Unconscious and conscious biases interact to affect emotions and attitudes towards persons who appear to be different from them.
The Power of Unconscious Bias
The unconscious reactions to information, events, sights, sounds, and words are the most powerful. For example, it is a quick decision of whether what one is dealing with is safe or potentially harmful. It causes individuals to dodge a passing bicycle before they realize they are in danger. This quick-thinking portion of the brain operates at a level most people are unaware of. The first unconscious reaction is more planned and intellectual – a conscious one.
For example, a person may leap away from something (the unconscious reaction) only to discover, with humiliation, that it was only the shadow of a bird flying above (the conscious reaction). People make split-second decisions on whether to welcome or dread another individual. It is a strong emotional reaction that might vary from happiness to discomfort or dread. Moreover, it occurs outside of our conscious awareness.
Unconscious bias influences how people react to others depending on their gender, skin color, facial features, age, size, voice, dress, appearance, and other factors. These reactions are based on connections formed at a young age. They are influenced by observations of their surroundings, such as how family members seem and act, who they see in their neighborhood, who their friends are, and how they view the various types of people depicted in the media.
This rapid subconscious thought can assist a person in making judgments and reacting to events without wasting mental energy. However, it might lead to illogical preconceptions and unfavorable behavior while interacting with others. Many people are opposed to the concept of unconscious prejudice.
People love to consider themselves reasonable, fair, kind, and objective. Recognizing that certain internal emotions are based on ethnicity might undermine one’s conviction in who individuals are. On the other hand, recognizing unconscious bias as a natural aspect of being human is a vital step towards more unbiased behavior.
Measuring and Revealing Implicit Bias
Understanding Implicit Bias and Its Measurement
Since unconscious or implicit prejudices emerge below the level of conscious thought, people are unaware of them. No amount of contemplation or reflection can bring these virtually immediate emotions to light. As a result, researchers cannot ask individuals questions to explain or assess this. Instead, they employ evaluations that test how strongly people identify various representations with various groups of people during quick reactions.
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) was created in the 1990s at Harvard University to evaluate unconscious connections based on ethnicity and is described in a widely regarded 1998 research publication. Since then, several variations of the test have been developed to assess unconscious prejudice based on gender, age, religion, weight, sexual orientation, and other identifying categories, and it has been administered to over 20 million people. The IAT discovered that most people connect white people with good attributes and black people with negative ones. This is true for participants of all races; the data show how widespread anti-black prejudice is, even among many black individuals.
Real-World Consequences of Unconscious Bias
Unconscious reactions to a person’s appearance or an incident can occasionally affect our conscious thinking, leading to unreasonable or contradictory behavior. A 2014 study of people’s attitudes to incoming storms found that respondents regarded hurricanes with male names as stronger and more destructive than those with feminine names.
When a hurricane with a male name comes, people are more inclined to evacuate than when a storm with a female name approaches. As a result, storms with feminine names kill more people. This is irrational, yet it demonstrates how unconscious gender prejudice may influence our behavior.
A second example is a 2012 research study in which pediatricians were given similar case scenarios for black and white patients. Physicians with higher implicit racial prejudices in favor of whites were more likely than black-skinned patients to administer narcotic medications following surgery.
Unconscious bias also impacts conscious thinking by rationalizing internal emotions with a socially acceptable reason. For example, when deciding between two equally competent candidates for a job, one black and one white, unconscious prejudice may drive individuals to choose the white candidate. However, without knowing why individuals are predisposed to make this decision, they invent a socially acceptable rationale in their brains to defend their choice. They continue to see themselves as persons who lack racial impartiality, oblivious to how unconscious bias influences their judgments, behavior, and thinking. Life events can also cause both unconscious and conscious prejudice.
Origins and Socialization of Bias
Historical structural barriers to racial integration, such as the drawing of boundaries determining where individuals of various ethnic backgrounds can dwell, are still present in the housing system today. As a result, many people grew up or resided in communities where most people looked like them. This can impact their friends, whom they meet, and with whom they are most comfortable. All of these variables can impact unconscious responses to persons of other races.
Similarly, an unconscious dislike of openly homosexual or bisexual persons may occur due to a lack of analogies or simply because these tendencies were concealed in their upbringing. When a person’s social circle lacks variety, he lacks actual individuals–unique persons he recognizes and trusts via extensive conversations–who can combat mental generalizations and stereotypes and lessen immediate judgments of unconscious biases.
Bias Formation in Early Childhood and Media Exposure
Conscious and unconscious biases coexist in the following manner: a quick, unconscious judgment of a person, friend, or foe, powerful or weak, followed by a more deliberate conscious evaluation, and maybe a reaction. According to research into the classic puppet experiment, many of these prejudices are formed in childhood. According to one recent study, after being exposed to preconceived conceptions, young infants develop negative attitudes towards other groups, even though their personal experiences are positive.
Another research study discovered that even seemingly innocuous school practices, such as instructors saying “Good morning, boys and girls” or having boys and girls play separately, led youngsters to show gender preconceptions and discriminate in picking whom to play with. Throw in lifetime prejudices and assumptions learned through the media, heard from friends and relatives, or seen in books and movies, and it is no surprise that individuals have unconscious biases.
Distinguishing Between Cognitive and Unconscious Bias
Many individuals mix up cognitive and implicit prejudice. These mental blind spots impact every aspect of life, from health and attitudes to purchasing. In other words, when it comes to what is best for people as individuals, a proclivity for cognitive biases always works against us by making us less likely to acquire what we desire. Cognitive biases affect judgment rather than attitude. Ironically, cognitive biases such as optimism and the influence of overconfidence frequently lead to positive views.
Once people learn the implications of cognitive biases, they frequently get into a terrible mood due to the tragic outcomes of these harmful mistakes in judgment. Cognitive bias differs from unconscious prejudice. Although cognitive biases can result in biased patterns of thinking and emotion, they are not the same thing. Cognitive biases are shared by all humans and are connected to brain anatomy. In contrast, unconscious bias pertains to group judgments and is unique to modern culture.
Unconscious prejudice is a widespread issue. When individuals recognize that unconscious prejudice is a systematic issue, they must rethink their internal culture. According to research, many black police officers are biased against black people and have an unfavorable perception of them. This unconscious bias, held by many black police officers, serves to demonstrate that this type of prejudice is attributable, at least in part, to the internal culture of police departments rather than to racial ideas.
Internal conventions, rules, and training processes sustain such cultures, and any police agency intending to overcome unconscious prejudice must first address internal culture before attributing racism to individual officers. In other words, rather than arguing that there were a few bad apples in the box of nice apples, we should see that unconscious prejudice is a systemic issue. So both the structure and connections of the box should be altered.
Another point to emphasize is that there is no shame or guilt in unconscious prejudice because it is not the result of any wrongdoing on the part of the individual. This method will minimize the audience’s defensiveness and assist them in seeing and accepting the situation. Unconscious prejudice is common and frequently contradicts our conscious ideals. Everyone has unconscious biases and prejudices that result from a proclivity to categorize others into social groupings. This aided our forefathers in promptly assessing potential dangers, but it sadly gets in the way of daily life.
Bias in the Workplace: Common Types and Solutions
The workplace is one of the most important areas of life where prejudice may have a big influence. One of the most powerful prejudices is the employee’s gender. People’s thoughts and preconceptions regarding the personal attributes of people of a particular gender evolve. How a person grew up, where they grew up, how they were socialized, what their social identity is, what other social groups they belong to, who their friends are, and the influence of the media all shape a person’s thoughts and feelings about certain groups of people, particularly what makes a man a man and a woman. However, it is crucial to highlight that most stereotypes are deeply established, unconscious ideas that have evolved in our brains over many years due to the combination of different variables, and which individuals frequently cannot change.
Implicit Bias
In the workplace, implicit biases can also manifest themselves, affecting the entire workflow and hiring process. Companies that employ for “cultural fit” reasons are prone to this form of prejudice. Candidates with similar interests, experiences, and backgrounds are more likely to be liked. However, their existence should not be the deciding factor.
Here are some strategies for avoiding being swayed by these prejudices. Take note of the parallels between the manager and the candidate. Distinguish between attributes, dislikes, and particular abilities, experience, and unique qualities that will be a valuable addition to the team rather than merely a “cultural” match.
Ageism
The inclination to evaluate another person based on their age is known as ageism. Victims of ageism are more likely to be older than younger persons, particularly in the United States. Approximately 58 percent of workers say that when they reach the age of 50, they begin to face age discrimination.
At that point, it becomes more difficult for them to shift employment, obtain work, or develop in their careers as firms increasingly choose younger workers, even though experience and expertise are essential skills for any successful organization. There are methods around this. Employers must discuss ageism with their teams and dispel some myths about employees of various ages.
Anchoring Effect
The anchoring effect occurs when a person chooses based on a tiny quantity of information. It can also occur in the workplace. Comparing possible prospects is a frequent occurrence in the recruiting process. When assessing other applicants, a recruiter may notice one feature in a candidate and be unable to “overlook” that trait.
For example, the first prospect considered by the recruiter may be prepared to accept a significantly lower wage than the rest. This might result in an anchor effect, with the following applicants requesting more. To avoid this, compare all potential features and never rely on a single detail to make a selection.
Attribution Error
An attribution error occurs when a person attempts to comprehend or criticize another person’s behavior based on previous observations and interactions with that person, which formed their opinion of that person. People tend to criticize and draw judgments about others without understanding the entire situation. An attribution error might cause hiring managers and recruiters to reject a candidate because of anything unusual on their résumé or unexpected behavior during an interview.
Instead of presuming that a candidate is unqualified just because they were late for an interview, it is advisable to inquire what caused their tardiness. This incident might be perfectly benign and unheard of. If the manager has any queries about anything on the CV or something expressed by the candidate during the interview, the manager should ask them.
Affirmation Bias
Affirmation bias is the tendency to construct an opinion about a situation or person based on goals, beliefs, and prejudices rather than objective facts. Such prejudices frequently have a detrimental influence on recruiting new applicants. When a manager initially analyses a CV, he or she makes an initial judgment of a possible applicant based on minor variables such as his or her name, hometown, and place of study, among others. Moreover, the viewpoint he forms can accompany him throughout the interview process. As a result, the manager asks questions that confirm his or her original impression of the candidate.
To avoid the negative impact of the point of view, the employer should try to understand that each interview will be a unique discourse regardless of the person’s background; therefore, it is important to ask standardized questions based on the position requirements, giving each candidate an equal opportunity. This will discourage employees from asking too many unconventional questions, which will significantly affect their thoughts.
Conformity Bias
Conformity bias, often known as peer pressure, is the propensity for people to behave like others around them, regardless of their own views or quirks. The problem is that the majority may need to be corrected, causing the manager to reject a superb applicant because he or she ignores his or her own view in favor of that of colleagues. Employers should urge interviewees to write down and transmit their feedback separately following the interview to avoid being influenced by peers before creating a recruitment committee to examine applicants. Then, gather the team and let everyone give their say.
When two or more products come into contact and are compared, either simultaneously or one after the other, one’s performance tends to be exaggerated. This frequently has a contrasting impact in the workplace: it may not appear so, but it is one of the most typical kinds of hiring prejudice. When a company evaluates many possible employees, it is simple to compare one offer to another and determine which one is superior.
A successful interview with one candidate, on the other hand, may prompt a manager to be skeptical of the next. To avoid this, the company should develop a systematic method for assessing candidates and conducting interviews so that the team can analyze them more thoroughly. Individual performance assessments and prizes are also affected by this.
Gender Bias
A preference for one gender over another is referred to as gender bias. Men are frequently preferred over women in the workplace. However, research has revealed that both men and women favor male candidates. When both candidates are equally competent, men are 1.5 times more likely than women to get hired. To avoid this, employers should endeavor to assess applications more thoroughly. The manager eliminates applicant details such as name and interests that might betray the individual’s intended gender. Candidates should be compared based on their experience and talents, not on traits that may influence a decision about them.
Heuristics
Heuristics are mental labels that assist people in making better decisions. When people make decisions based on their emotions, they exhibit a heuristic effect. This can sometimes speed up decision-making, but it is not always the most accurate or fair option. For example, despite all of the prior favorable aspects in the dialogue, an applicant for an interview may make an unintended statement that offends the recruiter. Although the candidate was the most qualified, the recruiter declined him or her due to the rude statement.
Personal Reflection and Overcoming Bias
After further study of unconscious biases, I realized that everyone, myself included, has biases operating below his or her unconscious level. As for my implicit biases, I naturally gravitated toward making friends of my cultural background. That is not necessarily a bad thing, in any case. It would be nice to broaden my horizons and build sincere relationships with people from my background. Having different cultures promotes cultural awareness and helps me and others to accept people of different races and ethnicities for their uniqueness.
Being visually impaired, I tend to judge people by listening to their voices, and this is mostly true for women. If a person has a calm voice, I want to listen to them more and present them as beautiful. In doing so, I use the beauty bias, a social behavior where I believe attractive people are more successful, competent, and qualified. This virus was very difficult for me because my hearing is very acute. However, I became aware of my biases when I began to self-educate, pay attention to my thoughts, and examine my beliefs, which helped me identify my assumptions at the time.
As a result, implicit bias is an intrinsic predisposition for or against something. People might often attribute specific features or characteristics to others due to unconscious biases, a process known as stereotyping. It is critical to remember that implicit biases are nearly totally unconscious. Implicit prejudices, on the other hand, are unintentional and uncontrollable. Such biases may exist subconsciously, even if someone verbally opposes a particular perspective or idea. These prejudices do not always align with a person’s sentiments and identity.
People may have good or bad connections with their ethnicity, gender, religion, or other personal characteristics in numerous circumstances. Biases are ideas and beliefs that form and are reinforced throughout a person’s life due to interactions with family and others, as well as media, cultural occurrences, and historical notions. Even our everyday language and perceptions of the societies in which we live include bias. As a result, detecting and then overcoming unconscious prejudices is a difficult undertaking.
Reference List
Anne-Laure Mention, ‘The future of Fintech’, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 62, no. 4, 2019, pp. 59–63. Web.
Anthony G. Greenwald and Calvin K. Lai, ‘Implicit social cognition’, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 71, no. 1, 2020, pp. 419–445. Web.
Jeanette Schnierle, Nicole Christian-Brathwaite, and Margee Louisias, ‘Implicit bias: What every pediatrician should know about the effect of bias on health and Future Directions’, Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, Vol. 49, no. 2, 2019, pp. 34–44. Web.
Klea Faniko, Naomi Ellemers, and Belle Derks, ‘The queen bee phenomenon in academia 15 years after: Does it still exist, and if so, why?’, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 60, no. 2, 2020, pp. 383–399. Web.
Laura VanPuymbrouck, Carli Friedman, and Heather Feldner, ‘Explicit and implicit disability attitudes of healthcare providers.’, Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 65, no. 2, 2020, pp. 101–112. Web.
Marie Uncovska, Bettina Freitag, Sven Meister, and Leonard Fehring, ‘Patient acceptance of prescribed and fully reimbursed mHealth apps in Germany: An UTAUT2-based online survey study’, Journal of Medical Systems, Vol. 47, no. 1, 2023. Web.
Matthias Brunmair and Tobias Richter, ‘Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators.’, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 145, no. 11, 2019, pp. 1029–1052. Web.
Matthieu Raoelison, Valerie A. Thompson, and Wim De Neys, ‘The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking’, Cognition, Vol. 204, 2020, p. 104381. Web.
Md. Abdul Malak, Abdul Majed Sajib, Mohammad Abdul Quader, and Humayra Anjum, ‘“We are feeling older than our age”: Vulnerability and adaptive strategies of aging people to cyclones in coastal Bangladesh’, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 48, 2020, p. 101595. Web.
Nao Hagiwara, Frederick W Kron, Mark W Scerbo, and Ginger S Watson, ‘A call for grounding implicit bias training in clinical and translational frameworks’, The Lancet, Vol. 395, no. 10234, 2020, pp. 1457–1460. Web.
Roy Martin Simamora, Daniel De Fretes, Ezra Deardo Purba, and Daniel Pasaribu, ‘Practices, challenges, and prospects of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic in Higher Education: Lecturer perspectives’, Studies in Learning and Teaching, Vol. 1, no. 3, 2020, pp. 185–208. Web.
Toni Calasanti, ‘Brown Slime, the silver tsunami, and apocalyptic demography: The importance of ageism and age relations’, Social Currents, Vol. 7, no. 3, 2020, pp. 195–211. Web.