Rogers’ self-actualization theory is primarily concerned with determining the conditions under which a person might fully realize their potential. The whole idea is founded on a sole life force that he refers to as the actualizing tendency. He defined realizing propensity as the integral inspiration that each human being has to fulfill their perspective to the utmost degree attainable (Saul, 2013). Carl asserted that each human being aspires to make the most of his life. He felt that if a person is given the right atmosphere, he may grow and flourish in life. Rodgers is handled with the following criteria for an appropriate environment: Genuineness – Empathy Acceptance.
Rogers’ self-actualization hypothesis is founded on a humanistic and phenomenological perspective. One fundamental motivator, he argued, is the need to self-actualize. It is not the individual’s fault if he does not attain his full potential; instead, it is the force of the background in which he lives. Each person has potential that manifests in other conduct based on their disposition. He believes that individuals are naturally creative and kind (Saul, 2013). People are only disparaging because of a weak self-concept and external obstacles. He believed that to attain self-actualization, a person needs to be in a state of congruence.
Hence, self-actualization transpires when a person’s ideal self equals their actual conduct perfectly and he considers a self-actualizing individual to be functional. The fully functioning person represents the pinnacle of psychological growth. A fully functioning person has several characteristics, including awareness of all experiences, living wholly in every moment, confidence in one’s abilities, a sense of freedom and power, and originality (Saul, 2013). Rogers took a positive view of human nature, believing in free will and emphasizing the importance of the environment over genetics. Individuals can develop without being limited by their experience.
Reference
McLeod, S. (2013). AWAKEN: Carl Rodgers. Web.