Introduction
In early care and education, individuals make an effort to an entire family engagement. Therefore, it is essential to understand the frequency with which they face emotional problems and challenges with over-demanding families. In most cases, young people have issues with their closest peers. These events usually lead to anxiety and depression, resulting in emotional distress. Families and caregivers are required to offer positive support, which is essential for developing good relationships among family members through ensuring quality care for new generations in early education programs.
The failure to do so would indicate severe consequences for the children in over-demanding families. They are related to the lack of proper guidance, which is essential for personality formation in the long run, and the attempts to substitute it with a rigorous approach. In most societies, parents tend to protect their children from external threats. Therefore, early care education experts are required to be sensitive to their perspectives.
In some situations, this person’s family members develop a feeling of being threatened as they perceive it as a loss of control. Subsequently, the adults become seemingly helpless and ascribe the emerged problem to their incompetence in the matter. This feeling adversely changes their attitude towards their children and leads to new conflicts. Interestingly, waiting for the crisis to pass is the best strategy, whereas most events require timely intervention for finding a solution for the benefit of all participants.
Purpose and the Topic Selection
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the frequency with which participants experience emotional problems and difficulties with over-demanding families. This topic has been selected due to the reasons youngsters face this challenge and how they affect their lives in society. It was underpinned by the importance of revealing the number of individuals who believe that their family members’ demands are too high or irrational in terms of distributed responsibilities. This initiative can help detect the general tendency and predict the consequences of parents’ improper conduct for their children’s well-being in the future. Thus, the study will assess the event’s participants struggle with challenges concerning emotions and their correlation with the perceived strict rules.
Literature Review
Family ties are directly connected to one’s well-being over the life course. Therefore, it is essential to understand the quality of these relationships and their diversity when explaining parents’ impact on children in the long run (Thomas et al., 2017).
Several pathways link family relationships to the well-being of their members. There is a life-course perspective, which describes the characteristics of their connection and interdependence throughout their lives regardless of external circumstances (Thomas et al., 2017). This phenomenon is usually analyzed by the communication patterns at each stage, depending on their age and other conditions. For example, parents’ interactions with a child with his transition to adolescence remain interdependent, but the degree of their closeness differs.
The quality of individuals’ communication in the family setting and, more specifically, parents’ support influence their offspring’s future. According to recent research, these factors alongside stressors are viewed as the core components of the stress process theory (Thomas et al., 2017). Therefore, it should be carefully monitored to prevent complications promptly.
Besides, these people’s situations are characterized by the same set of emotional scarring problems caused by over-demanding families and the pain from their parents’ actions, words, and attitudes (Neppl et al., 2016). These circumstances lead to impairments in their self-development since the affected persons have to take care of themselves without outside assistance. This reversed perception of duties might lead to the inability of a grown-up child to build healthy relationships.
Ultimately, the outcomes of this deviation from the normal development of a child include inner nervousness and the emergence of feelings, which they cannot explain or ascribe to a person or an event.
Methods
For this study, the GSS data is obtained in several ways. It is accepted through face-to-face interviews, and the GSS replicate score’s survey questions are regularly administered to be part of each GSS (Almquist et al., 2019). The core items comprise the background information about the respondents. The participants are random people whose addresses are selected scientifically across random households within the United States. The sample represents the general population of non-institutionalized English or Spanish American adults. The National Science Foundation funds the present study. Besides, the data are collected every two years and made available six months after collection. As for the two variables, an emotional problem and on-demand families, they were examined in 2018. Each individual was sampled to respond to the survey questions through in-person or telephone interviews.
Findings
Table 1: Response Frequency for Emotional Problem Survey
Table 2: Response Frequency Table for Demands Survey
Table 1: The frequency table for the emotional problem survey indicates that most answers were “never,” “rarely,” and “sometimes,” and they amounted to 727, 686, and 601, respectively. Besides, the number of options mentioned together was 2014 among the 2329 choices in total. Again, the valid percentages associated with the first three categories of the answers were 31.2%, 29.5%, and 25.8%. Moreover, the count and the reasonable rates revealed a general tendency not to have noticeable issues or small numbers.
Table 2: The frequency table for the demand survey indicated that most answers were “no, never,” because it amounted to 696 among the 1169 choices in total. Besides, the valid percentage of this category of responses was 59.5%. The count and the suitable amounts of answers showed that the general tendency was to lack an inadequate number of responsibilities and the participants’ families’ demands to meet their expectations.
Crosstabs Illustration
After reviewing the general guidelines and the past discussions, I have determined that based on the chosen variables, EMOPROBS (DV) and DEMANDS (IV), my test of significance will be the CHI-Square method. Since both ordinal and I will conduct gamma test.
Table 3: Chi-Square Test
While testing the significance level at.01, it is determined that the approximate significance is.000. Since 0.00<.01, then I must reject the Null Hypothesis. Based on the frequencies listed, participants experience difficulties with over-demanding families related to the rate of emotional problems. While testing the significance of the variables and the strength of association, I have determined that both variables, EMOPROBS (DV) and DEMANDS (IV), are ordinal, and I will be conducting a gamma test correlation.
After review, it is determined that the direction of association is positive as determined by the “+”.346 gamma value. In this case, as the demands from the participant’s family decrease, the emotional problems decreased. In addition, the strength of the association is strong since the gamma value is more significant than + or -.3. I have determined that knowing DEMANDS (IV) will reduce error predicting by 34.6% with these findings.
Table 4:Variables, EMOPROBS (DV) and DEMANDS (IV)
Discussion
The study evaluated the frequency with which the participants experienced the emotional problems and feelings of an inadequate number of responsibilities their families demanded to fulfill. The first survey questions reflected on how often the participants had been affected by emotional issues. The answer categories were as follows: “never,” “rarely,” “sometimes,” “often,” and “very often.” The total number of valid answers presented with a percentage of individuals in each category excluding the missing data was 2329. Besides, the frequency of answers “never” was 727, with a good percent of 31.2. The response “rarely” was given by 29.2% of respondents, whereas other categories amounted to 25.6%, 10.0%, and 3.4%, respectively.
The second survey questions demonstrated how often the participants experienced too many demands from their families. The answer categories were: “no, never,” “yes, but seldom,” “yes, sometimes,” “yes, often,” and “yes, very often.” The total number of the answer “no, never” was 696, with a good percent of 59.5. The response “yes, but seldom” was given by 19.5% of participants, whereas other categories accounted for 15.1%, 3.8%, and 2.1%, respectively.
The second survey questions demonstrated how often the participants experienced too many demands from their families. The answer categories were: “no, never,” “yes, but seldom,” “yes, sometimes,” “yes, often,” and “yes, very often.” The total number of the answer “no, never” was 696, with a good percent of 59.5%. The response “yes, but seldom” was given by 19.5% of participants, whereas other categories accounted for 15.1%, 3.8%, and 2.1%, respectively.
Conclusion
The survey shows that emotional problems are more common in the case of an unfavorable environment. It means that over-demanding families cause individuals to face difficulties of this nature more often than others.
In this regard, there is a need future research focusing on the for expansion of the methods for improving family relationships. A significant number of research studies are ardent to examining this aspect of family life, and they report the interrelation between finding a solution to these issues and better health outcomes. Thus, it is critical to understand how to ensure well-being in the home setting for young generations and develop appropriate behavior.
References
Almquist, Y. B., Kvart, S., & Brännström, L. (2019). A practical guide to quantitative methods with SPSS. Department of Public Health Sciences: Stockholm University. Web.
Masarik, A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development: A review of the family stress model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 85-90. Web.
Neppl, T. K., Senia, J. M., & Donnellan, M. B. (2016). Effects of economic hardship: Testing the family stress model over time. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(1), 12. Web.
Thomas, P. A., Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2017). Family relationships and well-being. Innovation in Ageing, 1(3). Web.