The psychological study is considered to be research that psychoanalysts administer for an examination of the experiences and actions of individual people or groups. The analysis can intend informative, professional, and clinical purposes. Moreover, psychologists apply various scientific methods based on a research question. Each method implies a unique way of data production and analysis. For instance, a qualitative approach is used for description and characterization, whereas a quantitative one is concerned with numeric variables. Thus, to choose the most suitable research method for my study connected to the consequences of stress in students, it is essential to analyze the methodology in scholarly articles.
Scientific Methods in the Scholarly Research
Research Method Followed
The study by Hutter et al. (2016) examined which education practices are beneficial for which training results. The study mainly explored in what way learning activities contribute to education outcomes. This goal was associated with ideas of pragmatism, which is related to functionality and usefulness. The researchers applied the qualitative method of data gathering and connected it with a quantitative approach (Hutter et al., 2016). For qualitative analysis, researchers used structured interviews (Hutter et al., 2016). The interview type was chosen due to the further coding of the discovered data that was applied in the quantitative method (Hutter et al., 2016). The sample had a similar background experience, which contributed to a coherent contextual background. Overall, scholars used mixed methodology in their research.
Pieces of the Study
The study did not apply the technique of randomization, as the sample is too heterogeneous. According to Hutter et al. (2016), Eighteen participants or 64% of the individuals who took part in the research were volunteers (Hutter et al., 2016). Therefore, the scholars did not use random sampling, as the group of participants was based on people’s own desire to engage in the study. The researchers used a case-control study because they divided participants into two groups to compare the outcomes (Hutter et al., 2016). The study did not imply the use of placebos, as it was based on a questioner. Overall, the research results suggested that conventional learning practices are beneficial for improving knowledge of know-how topics.
The Research Project
Learning Outcomes of the Study
Furthermore, an interesting Psychology study is connected to researching how various stress levels influence pupils from academic, social, and emotional perspectives. The outcomes of these examinations might encourage further research intended to resolve specific behavior problems. Moreover, it can determine possible problems within the already existing literature about the topic. A study might determine that high levels of stress have negative consequences on students’ psychological state, leading to the possibility of leaving college before graduating. Thus, academics later might be able to determine possible ways of intervention to lower the dangerous stress levels. The research should be based on applied research concentrating on establishing real solutions for the world’s problems.
Scientific Methods of the Research Design
The possible research design for the given issues might be based on experimentation or a qualitative method of analysis. The first way might be particularly useful as it allows better control over the sample and provides unique experiences with participants. Moreover, the hands-on research might provide participants with natural to their setting habitat, which might contribute to the authenticity of a study. Furthermore, the qualitative method might provide insights into the participants’ emotional state. Mainly, semi-structured interviews can allow me to adjust to individual responses given by the selected sample. Overall, both experimental research and qualitative interviews can be useful for Psychological studies related to stress levels.
In conclusion, psychology studies are diverse, as they are conducted with the use of various methodologies based on the research question asked and the anticipated outcomes. The analysis by Hutter et al. (2016) explored the ways different studying techniques contribute to learning outcomes. The researchers used a mix-methods methodology, including qualitative and quantitative approaches. The study did not involve randomization or placebo, despite it being a case-control study. Lastly, I am particularly interested in researching more about the influence of stress on pupils. The study might benefit from experimentation or qualitative approaches.
Hutter, V., Oldenhof-Veldman, T., Pijpers, J. & Oudejans, R. (2016). Professional Development in Sport Psychology: Relating Learning Experiences to Learning Outcomes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. Web.