Summary
Physiological and Psychological Wellness
Stress significantly affects people’s well-being. The facets of well-being are multidimensional and encompass psychological, social, physical, emotional, career, intellectual, and environmental wellness. Lanchimba et al. (2023) state that a physiological response occurs when the sympathetic nervous system is activated, resulting in a fight-or-flight response. Pandley (2020) supports this idea by illustrating that physiological symptoms of stress include chronic backache, headaches, high blood pressure, and immune disorders, which impact wellness.
Similarly, Strizhitskaya et al. (2019) posit that stress causes fatigue, feelings of lethargy, and discomfort, which hinders wellness. In addition, Zafar et al. (2021) explain that stress causes health-related complications such as cardiovascular disorders, gastroesophageal reflux disorder, peptic ulcer disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. All these health issues associated with stress indicate that mental health disorders can impact well-being by causing bodily harm.
Stress affects wellness by increasing the risk of health problems, which can cause discomfort. Attia et al. (2022) established that stress causes cognitive and behavioral responses that may include depression, anxiety, and substance use disorder. The reason is that different people cope differently when faced with stressful situations, and this causes the manifestation of mental health problems. Likewise, the study by Hwang & Jo (2021)reveals that stress causes dissatisfaction in life, which increases mental health issues like paranoia and dissociative disorders. These impacts demonstrate that stress derails psychological wellness, reducing the quality of life.
Relational Problems
High-stress levels can impact social interactions, resulting in dysfunctional relationships. Amjadi et al. (2022) reveal that stress can lead an individual to avoid participating in social activities, appreciate solitude, or have a small social network with infrequent social interaction, resulting in social disconnectedness. Slimmen et al. (2022) explain that overstressed individuals tend to become lonely, making community engagement or the creation of a social network challenging, thereby impairing their relationships with others. Such extroversion significantly impairs how individuals engage with one another, creating relational discord.
Stress drives relationship conflicts through emotional responses and miscommunication. Bajaj et al. (2022) mention that stress reduces flexibility by increasing emotional responses to situations, which is associated with irrational decision-making. Wakeel et al. (2033) also explain that stress impairs problem-focused coping, making it difficult for individuals to address problems directly, which may result in blaming others, rejecting counsel, and overstimulation during arguments. All these issues make relating effectively with others challenging, resulting in social disconnectedness and other factors that diminish wellness.
Diminished Self-Efficacy and Quality of Life
Stress levels propel aging, and this is associated with reduced self-care and efficacy. Harvanek et al. (2021) explain that stress increases the production of Adrenocorticotropic hormone, which is associated with diseases such as Addison’s disease, which reduces self-efficacy. The study by Mahdzar et al. (2022) reveals that perceived stress can lead to intellectual dysfunction, including diminished concentration and insomnia, which derails effective cognitive functioning and self-efficacy. Parsaei et al. (2020) state that stress reduces work motivation, which is associated with diminished efficiency. This factor shows that increased stress levels can lead to irreversible health consequences that undermine wellness.
People who are stressed have reduced resilience, which affects their quality of life. Klainin-Yobas et al. (2021) found that resilience is critical for managing life stressors and helps individuals cope with adversity. Stress inhibits resilience, making an individual more easily defeated by challenges, which in turn affects their overall well-being. As Jukic et al. (2020) note, high stress levels are associated with low psychosocial and psychological well-being, as evidenced by persistent fatigue and dissatisfaction with life, which, in turn, reduce quality of life.
In addition, Tech et al. (2023) found that individuals who experience high stress develop poor lifestyle habits, including overeating, skipping meals, and reduced physical activity. Similarly, Schultchen et al. (2019) explain that stress reduces motivation to exercise, leading to health complications such as obesity and diabetes. In conclusion, Alexander highlights that stress has adverse effects by reducing optimism and spirituality, which are integral aspects that enhance quality of life.
Conclusions Regarding the Current State of Knowledge of the Literature Review Topic
The literature underscores the impact of stress on various dimensions of wellness among adults. The correlation between stress and wellness is highly relevant, as it affects the physiological, psychological, social, and emotional aspects of wellness. For instance, most studies, including that of Lanchimba et al. (2023), show that different types of stress, including perceived stress, activate the nervous system, putting the body in a state of arousal that can lead to complications such as increased blood pressure. The psychological impact of stress cannot be outweighed, considering the multiple pieces of evidence illustrating a positive correlation between stress and mental health disorders, including anxiety and depression. This body of literature supports the influence of stress on physiological well-being while highlighting the importance of managing stress to maintain health.
The systematic review demonstrates how stress disrupts social interactions. The literature illustrates how stress contributes to dysfunctional relationships and social disconnectedness, which is steered by emotional responses to triggers. In addition, the disorder diminishes self-efficacy by accelerating aging, which is associated with reduced intellectual functioning, making it difficult for individuals to concentrate and make informed decisions. Overall, the synthesis of the literature emphasizes the complex interplay between stress and wellness, highlighting the importance of maintaining a stress-free lifestyle to improve quality of life.
Real-World Implications and Application of Source Content
The information about the interaction between stress and wellness is informative in different real-world implications and applications. Knowledge of the interrelationship between the two variables can help mental health practitioners and researchers emphasize the need for effective stress management interventions in corporate and professional settings (Darling-Hammond et al., 2020). By learning to manage stress effectively, mental health practitioners can implement holistic approaches that enhance quality of life and satisfaction.
Stress management approaches can be implemented in various contexts to help diverse individuals benefit from the interventions. For instance, research can identify the most effective workplace mental health interventions to reduce stress and improve productivity (Darling-Hammond et al., 2020). In addition, healthcare providers can employ stress management strategies to help patients manage stress-related issues and enhance overall health outcomes.
The knowledge obtained from this research contributes to the understanding of the impact of stress on individual wellness. By illustrating the different effects of stress, including cardiovascular issues, social disconnectedness, and reduced productivity, individuals and organizations can understand the impact of this problem on individuals (Darling-Hammond et al., 2020). In addition, the information can help people establish stress management strategies that enhance productivity while reducing stress-related problems.
Gaps in the Literature
The literature above provides profound information on the physiological, social, and psychological impacts of stress among adults. However, their summary focuses on individuals aged 18 or older, meaning the results cannot be generalized to the general population (Slimmen et al., 2022). More investigation should focus on children and adolescents to determine whether the impact of stress is the same as that observed among adults. Such research can help generalize the recorded information to the general population.
The information obtained from the systematic review does not provide effective stress management interventions. This lack of research on the best approaches to managing stress and their efficacy provides an opportunity for studies in this area. In addition, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of stress management interventions across contexts, including learning institutions, healthcare settings, and workplaces. Therefore, the rational null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the effect of stress on well-being across the diverse population. On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis is that the effect of stress on wellness varies across socio-economic, cultural, and religious backgrounds.
The independent and dependent variables for the study on the impact of stress and wellness are as follows. The independent variable includes people from different settings, including socio-economic status, religion, cultural context, and profession. The dependent variable would be the adverse effects of stress, including anxiety, depression, headache, and gastrointestinal problems, among other impacts. These two variables are set to determine the interactions of the different aspects of wellness among individuals.
References
Amjadi, S., Mohammadi, S., & Khojastehrad, A. (2022). Perceived stress and quality of life among frontline nurses fighting against COVID-19: A web-based cross-sectional study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(1), 128.
Alexander, L. R. (2023). Altruism: A Moderator Between Stress and Wellness (Publication No. 30816962) (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). Proquest Publishing.
Attia, M., Ibrahim, F. A., Elsady, M. A. E., Khorkhash, M. K., Rizk, M. A., Shah, J., & Amer, S. A. (2022). Cognitive, emotional, physical, and behavioral stress-related symptoms and coping strategies among university students during the third wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13.
Bajaj, B., Khoury, B., & Sengupta, S. (2022). Resilience and Stress as Mediators in the Relationship of Mindfulness and Happiness. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
Harvanek, Z. M., Fogelman, N., Xu, K., & Sinha, R. (2021). Psychological and biological resilience modulates the effects of stress on epigenetic aging. Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 601.
Hwang, W. J., & Jo, H. H. (2021). Impact of mental health on wellness in adult workers. Frontiers in Public Health, 9.
Jukic, T., Ihan, A., Strojnik, V., Stubljar, D., & Starc, A. (2020). The effect of active occupational stress management on psychosocial and physiological well-being: A pilot study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20, 1-8.
Klainin-Yobas, P., Vongsirimas, N., Ramirez, D. Q., Sarmiento, J., & Fernandez, Z. (2021). Evaluating the relationships among stress, resilience and psychological well-being among young adults: A structural equation modelling approach. BMC Nursing, 20, 1-10.
Lanchimba, C., Díaz-Sánchez, J. P., & Velasco, F. (2023). Exploring factors influencing domestic violence: a comprehensive study on intrafamily dynamics. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14.
Mahdzar, M., Jaapar, A., Zain, W. Z. W. M., Hisham, H. M. A., Hassan, N., & Othman, N. A. A. (2022). Perceived stress on academic performance among university pre-diploma students. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 533-540.
Pandey, D. L. (2020). Work stress and employee performance: An assessment of impact of work stress. International Research Journal of Human Resource and Social Sciences, 7(05), 124-135.
Parsaei, R., Roohafza, H., Feizi, A., Sadeghi, M., & Sarrafzadegan, N. (2020). How different stressors affect quality of life: An application of multilevel latent class analysis on a large sample of industrial employees. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 1261-1270.
Schultchen, D., Reichenberger, J., Mittl, T., Weh, T. R., Smyth, J. M., Blechert, J., & Pollatos, O. (2019). Bidirectional relationship of stress and affect with physical activity and healthy eating. British Journal of Health Psychology, 24(2), 315-333.
Slimmen, S., Timmermans, O., Mikolajczak-Degrauwe, K., & Oenema, A. (2022). How stress-related factors affect mental well-being of university students: A cross-sectional study to explore the associations between stressors, perceived stress, and mental well-being. PLoS One, 17(11).
Strizhitskaya, O., Petrash, M., Savenysheva, S., Murtazina, I., & Golovey, L. (2019). Perceived stress and psychological well-being: The role of the emotional stability. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences(1),155-162).
Teh, G. Q., Tan, S. S., Tan, S. T., Hariyono, H., & Tan, C. X. (2023). Physical activity and dietary behavior in relation to perceived stress levels among young adults during the transition to endemic phase of Covid-19. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 31.
Wakeel, F., Hannah, J., & Gorfinkel, L. (2023). Stress, coping, and quality of life in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 18(5).
Zafar, M. S., Nauman, M., Nauman, H., Nauman, S., Kabir, A., Shahid, Z., & Batool, M. (2021). Impact of stress on human body: a review. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(3), 1-7.